Name: Father Christopher J. Rossman
A Catholic priest of the Archdiocese of Kansas City in KS currently assigned as the Associate Pastor of Prince of Peace parish in Olathe, KS.
BLOG: Contemplating Life
BLOG: Ego vos elegi
BLOG: The Heart of a Seminarian
BLOG: White Around the Collar
CATHOLIC: Catholic PrayerNet
WEB: Do No Harm: Research Ethics
WEB: Kenrick-Glennon Seminary
WEB: My Kenrick Web Site
today
May 2009
April 2009
March 2009
February 2009
January 2009
December 2008
November 2008
October 2008
September 2008
August 2008
July 2008
June 2008
May 2008
April 2008
March 2008
February 2008
January 2008
December 2007
November 2007
October 2007
September 2007
August 2007
July 2007
June 2007
May 2007
April 2007
March 2007
February 2007
January 2007
December 2006
November 2006
October 2006
September 2006
August 2006
July 2006
June 2006
May 2006
April 2006
March 2006
February 2006
January 2006
December 2005
November 2005
I had a motime email sent to me asking the exact question that is the title of this blog entry above. It seemed like both a prudent question and a question that maybe most people are not asking themselves. So, why are proponents pushing Amendment 2 so hard? The simple answer is money!
There are numerous financial gains that can be made by the passage of this amendment both for individuals and businesses. The major companies and research institutions are seeing dollar signs because this amendment would bring them millions upon millions of dollars in profit. Patents, new drugs and the sale of new embryonic stem-cell lines are just a few of the money trees that this amendment would bring. There is an excellent article on the Missouri Right to Life web site that points this out.
There are also individual gains to be had. For example, persons can be given huge sums of money for selling their eggs. Proponents of this amendment say that this is absolutely untrue and that the bill specifically bans this. They point to paragraph 2, subsection 4 in the legislation that says:
No person may, for valuable consideration, purchase or sell human blastocysts or eggs for stem cell research or stem cell therapies and cures.
These proponents, however, have written this statement so that it is completely misleading and full of double-talk. Let me explain. If you read paragraph 6, subsection 17 of the document you will see the term valuable consideration defined as:
"Valuable consideration" means financial gain or advantage, but does not include reimbursement for reasonable costs incurred in connection with the removal, processing, disposal, preservation, quality control, storage, transfer, or donation of human eggs, sperm, or blastocysts, including lost wages of the donor. Valuable consideration also does not include the consideration paid to a donor of human eggs or sperm by a fertilization clinic or sperm bank, as well as any other consideration expressly allowed by federal law.
Basically, if the research institution cannot compensate the women, they simply have a fertility clinic obtain the eggs, pay the donor (which often is a substantial sum of money) and then they "reimburse" the clinic for the costs of obtaining the eggs which, by dancing around the wording of the legislation, includes reimbursing the money put out by the clinic as payment to the donor.
It the use and "definition" of a number of words in the document that mislead and even circumvent the true purposes of what they wish to do. Money is a leading factor in this amendment, which is why these major institutes, research centers and fertility clinics are strongly supporting this legislation. Unfortunately, the dignity of life is being sold out literally by greed. Until next time...God bless.
