Name: Father Christopher J. Rossman
A Catholic priest of the Archdiocese of Kansas City in KS currently assigned as the Associate Pastor of Prince of Peace parish in Olathe, KS.
BLOG: Contemplating Life
BLOG: Ego vos elegi
BLOG: The Heart of a Seminarian
BLOG: White Around the Collar
CATHOLIC: Catholic PrayerNet
WEB: Do No Harm: Research Ethics
WEB: Kenrick-Glennon Seminary
WEB: My Kenrick Web Site
today
May 2009
April 2009
March 2009
February 2009
January 2009
December 2008
November 2008
October 2008
September 2008
August 2008
July 2008
June 2008
May 2008
April 2008
March 2008
February 2008
January 2008
December 2007
November 2007
October 2007
September 2007
August 2007
July 2007
June 2007
May 2007
April 2007
March 2007
February 2007
January 2007
December 2006
November 2006
October 2006
September 2006
August 2006
July 2006
June 2006
May 2006
April 2006
March 2006
February 2006
January 2006
December 2005
November 2005
I am sure many of you are aware of the great step forward for the Culture of Life last week with the Supreme Court upholding the ban on partial-birth abortion in the Gonzales v. Carhart case. This was a great litmus test for our Supreme Court. It was the first Culture of Death vs. Culture of Life case to come before the them since Alito and Roberts were appointed by Bush. All five Catholic Justices voted to uphold the ban. Yet, this doesn't mean that any Culture of Life issues that come before the Court are going to fall this way. Justice Anthony Kennedy, who is Catholic, voted to uphold the ban but he is what is considered the "swing vote" meaning that he is sometimes pro-life and sometimes not. The other Catholic Justices - Clarence Thomas, Antonin Scalia, John Roberts and Samual Alito - seem to be solid in their voting for Culture of Life issues.
The reason this vote was important, however, is that it shows that Roe v. Wade is NOT untouchable. If restrictions can be placed on it then it can also be overturned. For so many years, Roe v. Wade was considered an absolute right with no limits because it was an individual 'choice' one made. Of course, even individual choices have limits to its rights. For example, I do not have the right to choose to shoot the student two doors down from me because he is always playing his music too loud. I might do it (although that might affect my ability to complete my MA hence hindering my ordination - see I am now a priest-elect blog entry) but that isn't a right and as a matter of fact violates another person's rights. While this decision did not go as far as to speak of a person's rights, it did demonstrate that limits can be placed on abortion. That gives hope for the future. Until next time...God bless.
