Name: Father Christopher J. Rossman
A Catholic priest of the Archdiocese of Kansas City in KS currently assigned as the Associate Pastor of Prince of Peace parish in Olathe, KS.
BLOG: Contemplating Life
BLOG: Ego vos elegi
BLOG: The Heart of a Seminarian
BLOG: White Around the Collar
CATHOLIC: Catholic PrayerNet
WEB: Do No Harm: Research Ethics
WEB: Kenrick-Glennon Seminary
WEB: My Kenrick Web Site
today
May 2009
April 2009
March 2009
February 2009
January 2009
December 2008
November 2008
October 2008
September 2008
August 2008
July 2008
June 2008
May 2008
April 2008
March 2008
February 2008
January 2008
December 2007
November 2007
October 2007
September 2007
August 2007
July 2007
June 2007
May 2007
April 2007
March 2007
February 2007
January 2007
December 2006
November 2006
October 2006
September 2006
August 2006
July 2006
June 2006
May 2006
April 2006
March 2006
February 2006
January 2006
December 2005
November 2005
This question was asked and the way the question was worded inferred that not only was their questions about these new sins but also questioning the authority of the Church to just add new sins out of the blue. I say this because part of the question was, "It was God who gave us the original 7 mortal sins in the bible. Why did the Vatican think they should be able to create more?"
I will cover each of these individually because there are misunderstandings on each of these questions. First, the Vatican did not publish these 7 sins. Bishop Gianfranco Girotti, the regent of the Apostolic Penitentiary at the Vatican (the person in charge with reconciliation in the Church) brought up these sins in an interview. The media made it sound like these 'new' sins were proclaimed from the mouth of the pope. The reality is that they were taken out of aqninterview the bishop gave to the Vatican newspaper, L'Osservatore Romano, by an Italian reporter who saw a way to make a 'headline story' from the comments.
The second issue is that the 7 mortal sins were not definitively spelled out in the bible. While they are certainly all sins and do appear in the bible, they are not listed as the '7 deadly sins' nor are they even listed all at one time in the same book of scripture. The 7 deadly sins as we know them actually were not listed as such until in the 6th century by Pope Gregory the Great and were popularized in the Middle Ages by Dante in "The Inferno."
If one examines these 7 'new' sins they will see that they are not 7 new deadly sins rather examples of the existing 7 deadly sins. The 7 deadly sins are: lust, gluttony, avarice, sloth, anger, envy and pride. Now, look at the sins listed by the bishop: Bioethical violations such as birth control, morally dubious experiments such as stem cell research, drug abuse, polluting the environment, contributing to widening divide between rich and poor, excessive wealth & creating poverty. It is immediately recognizable that while the 7 deadly sins are a list of sins the list the bishop gives are examples of sins. The 7 deadly sins are very broad. The sins stated by the bishop are very specific. For example, the sin of gluttony could be excess food, alcohol, television, sex or a number of other things. Drug abuse, however, is very specific and defines a particular means of committing a sin.
Lastly, if you look at these 7 social sins, which is what the Vatican is titling them, they are examples of the 7 deadly sins. For example, excess wealth is a sin agains both gluttony, avarice and pride. Polluting the environment is a sin against sloth.
Being concerned over the Vatican's authority to be able to come out with a list of modern sins seems to go beyond these sins. It seems to be a sign of questioning the Vatican's authority to interfere in our modern world and our lives. That, however, sounds like a topic for a later blog entry. Until next time...God bless.
